<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BTW &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/</link>
	<description>The View From Connecticut's Northwest Corner</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Brown</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351631</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351631</guid>
		<description>Jake, since Federal law specifically prohibits favoring one candidate for a Civil Service position over another on the basis of political affiliation, I am sad to say that I don't know what you are talking about.

The story in the NYT reflected politicized hiring of career civil servants in the Justice Department, not firing US Attorneys (which ought to be apolitical but probably never can be completely).  What the Bush administration effectively did in this case was to attempt to reinstate the "spoils system" -- hopefully something that our nation has been rid of for more than a century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, since Federal law specifically prohibits favoring one candidate for a Civil Service position over another on the basis of political affiliation, I am sad to say that I don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.</p>
<p>The story in the NYT reflected politicized hiring of career civil servants in the Justice Department, not firing US Attorneys (which ought to be apolitical but probably never can be completely).  What the Bush administration effectively did in this case was to attempt to reinstate the &#8220;spoils system&#8221; &#8212; hopefully something that our nation has been rid of for more than a century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351170</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351170</guid>
		<description>The New York Times uses a sadly elementary rhetorical slight of hand here. The "journalist" applies the "political litmus test" criticism (which has validity when discussing judicial appointments) to the inherently political appointments of prosecutors to the Justice Department. The individual who wrote that article shouldn't assume that everyone is as ignorant of how the three branches of government work as he seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times uses a sadly elementary rhetorical slight of hand here. The &#8220;journalist&#8221; applies the &#8220;political litmus test&#8221; criticism (which has validity when discussing judicial appointments) to the inherently political appointments of prosecutors to the Justice Department. The individual who wrote that article shouldn&#8217;t assume that everyone is as ignorant of how the three branches of government work as he seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Brown</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351129</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351129</guid>
		<description>Terry, as a former Republican committeeman, it makes me genuinely sad to say it, but I am afraid that, at this point in time, no Republican get elected Prez without carrying a huge amount of GWB baggage.

Bush's behavior has been reprehensible on many levels that are not related to his being beholden to some pretty terrible people -- but I am afraid that on balance the GOP has really covered itself with mud this time, and that it will take something approaching reinvention of the party to redeem it.

All political parties attract bad people who do bad things -- it's the nature of the beast -- but what we have seen these past eight years seems to me to be at least an order of magnitude more corrupt and cynical than I can recall in any previous administration regardless of party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, as a former Republican committeeman, it makes me genuinely sad to say it, but I am afraid that, at this point in time, no Republican get elected Prez without carrying a huge amount of GWB baggage.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s behavior has been reprehensible on many levels that are not related to his being beholden to some pretty terrible people &#8212; but I am afraid that on balance the GOP has really covered itself with mud this time, and that it will take something approaching reinvention of the party to redeem it.</p>
<p>All political parties attract bad people who do bad things &#8212; it&#8217;s the nature of the beast &#8212; but what we have seen these past eight years seems to me to be at least an order of magnitude more corrupt and cynical than I can recall in any previous administration regardless of party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351097</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-351097</guid>
		<description>Yes but Geoff, that's like saying no Republican can get elected prez without reverting to GWB behaviors. And BTW, Dems also take money from sleazy people. Take it away, John Huang ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but Geoff, that&#8217;s like saying no Republican can get elected prez without reverting to GWB behaviors. And BTW, Dems also take money from sleazy people. Take it away, John Huang &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Brown</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-350594</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2008/06/25/btw/#comment-350594</guid>
		<description>I agree that it is hard to imagine McCain being quite as disreputable and sleazy as the Bush Administration -- and I suspect that the recent revelations scarcely scratch the surface.

However, I do think that it's important to realize that McCain cannot be elected without the enthusiastic and generous support of the same folks who brought us the Bushies.  It's hard to imagine that McCain -- who, presumably, would honor any deals he had made -- would take their money and support and then spit in their eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is hard to imagine McCain being quite as disreputable and sleazy as the Bush Administration &#8212; and I suspect that the recent revelations scarcely scratch the surface.</p>
<p>However, I do think that it&#8217;s important to realize that McCain cannot be elected without the enthusiastic and generous support of the same folks who brought us the Bushies.  It&#8217;s hard to imagine that McCain &#8212; who, presumably, would honor any deals he had made &#8212; would take their money and support and then spit in their eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
