St. Timmy’s Passing
June 17, 2008 on 11:45 am | In Main, Media, National |Update 1:30 p.m. Wednesday: After reading this interview, my opinion of Timmy has been raised a notch. Good for him for his willingness to discuss MSM bias without dismissing it as some kooky right-wing grievance.
* * * * * * * *
To this point, I have resisted commenting on the passing of NBC’s Tim Russert. I have mostly been watching in disbelief as much of the news media heap so much praise on the fallen newsman that you’d think he was the journalistic equivalent of Jesus himself.
I agree with Colin McEnroe. You tend to feel awkward when someone who mostly annoys you kicks the bucket, especially if you’re a writer and get paid to give your assessment of people like Russert.
But mostly I have held back from writing about Russert because I have been waiting for a piece like this. That’s how brave I am. I’m not sure whether it’s OK to speak ill of the dead until someone else does it. But Jack Shafer jumped in first, so here goes.
Here’s what I liked about Russert: his humble beginnings; his passion for journalism and politics; his strong family life; he worked for Pat Moynihan (whom I admired) and; sometimes, the way he ran Meet The Press.
Here’s what I did not like about him: Russert was a slippery player in the Scooter Libby-Valerie Plame imbroglio; he is the very embodiment of the Washington media establishment; and nowhere is the incestuous world of power journalism more on display than in the self-indulgent assumption that the rest of the world cares as much about Russert’s passing as the media do.
Let’s face it: the coverage of his death is more fitting for a head of state than a TV journo. I think Terrence McCarthy got it right on Colin’s blog. It’s likely Russert is rolling his eyes from the grave at the excessive coverage of his passing. Then again, maybe he’s just flashing that wolfish grin …
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^


Until the MSM gives one one hundredth of the same air time to the death of a Medal of Honor winner, I’ll choose to ignore the Washington media’s embarrassing spectacle over Russert’s death.
Comment by jake — June 17, 2008 #
As someone who gets most of his news from print and on-line sources, I have to admit that Mr. Russert’s name was only vaguely familiar to me when his death was announced.
To me it certainly looks like the broadcast media are making themselves into a news event. Although I rarely seem to come down in the same place Jake does, I have to say that I agree with him on this one!
Comment by Geoff Brown — June 17, 2008 #
Geoff… common ground is as good as a home field advantage. May there be more!
Comment by Jake — June 17, 2008 #
All good points. Reminds me of the coverage of the invasion of Iraq when Peter Arnett got shit-canned from the theater for revealing battle plans, and he became the story of the week. It made me want to tell all the reporters, “Sorry, guys; there is a war on here, and you reporters are not the main story…”, but none of them would have had a clue…
Comment by John Pollard — June 17, 2008 #
A JP comment! We are blessed!
Comment by jake — June 17, 2008 #
The coverage of Tim Russerts death ahs only been slightly less agrivating than the coverage on Anna Nicole Smith.
I liked both of them:
Anna Nicole for her assets
Tim Russert for his friendly demeanor
I don’t think either of them deserved the amount of coverage they got…
Throw in a days worth of Willie Randolph coverage and it really puts me over the top.
UGH!
Comment by Marshall Miles — June 18, 2008 #