<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professor Kennedy</title>
	<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2007/01/18/professor-kennedy/</link>
	<description>What's Going On Here?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2007/01/18/professor-kennedy/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2007/01/18/professor-kennedy/#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>I also like his message that just because a student has an above average IQ doesn't mean s/he sill be wasting his/her life if college isn't a part of it.

College isn't always an appropriate place, even for the gifted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like his message that just because a student has an above average IQ doesn&#8217;t mean s/he sill be wasting his/her life if college isn&#8217;t a part of it.</p>
<p>College isn&#8217;t always an appropriate place, even for the gifted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankee</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2007/01/18/professor-kennedy/#comment-4320</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2007/01/18/professor-kennedy/#comment-4320</guid>
		<description>Regarding Murray's WSJ op-ed on education, I especially appreciated the first of the three-part series. His theme was the limits of education in turning every child into a superior student. A very common sense observation that is too often left out of the ongoing discussion on educational reform. It is indeed true that unlike Lake Woebegone, not every child is above average in intelligence, and we should not design our schools as if they were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Murray&#8217;s WSJ op-ed on education, I especially appreciated the first of the three-part series. His theme was the limits of education in turning every child into a superior student. A very common sense observation that is too often left out of the ongoing discussion on educational reform. It is indeed true that unlike Lake Woebegone, not every child is above average in intelligence, and we should not design our schools as if they were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
