Really? I’ll Look Into It!
December 7, 2006 on 6:16 pm | In Main, State |
In case you missed it, there was a very troubling story in Tuesday’s Hartford Courant on a scathing report issued by state and outside authorities on the internal affairs division of the Connecticut State Police.
Simply put, the 168-page report completed by Attorney General Dick Blumenthal’s office and the New York State Police paints a picture of an IA unit that was out of control and not doing its job. Authorities in whom we had invested our trust to police the police were either looking the other way or failed to follow-up on obvious leads. And there is strong evidence that they were directed to do so by superiors.
At one troop, The Courant reported yesterday, “an ‘open competition‘ existed among some troopers over who could make the most drunken-driving arrests on the midnight shift” — with little care given as to whether the arrests were legitimate or not. Of course, IA failed to properly investigate this matter as well.
This just drives home a point I like to make regularly (though not yet on this blog, if I’m not mistaken). You can’t trust any organization to investigate itself properly and fairly. The police have an obvious conflict of interest in having their IA divisions look into allegations of misbehavior. And not only because investigators are reluctant to report unflattering truths to their superiors.
I have a relative (one of the good guys) who worked a relatively short stint in IA for a big-city police department. He said good, honest IA investigators are typically detested by the rank-and-file. When IA officers walk into a roomful of cops, silence is the order of the day, often followed by baleful glances.
It stands to reason that the best way to avoid being treated as a pariah by crooked fellow cops is for the IA officer to gain a reputation as someone who won’t look seriously into allegations and complaints. Case in point: it took an outside investigative agency (in this case, troopers from neighboring New York) to expose the appalling chicanery in Connecticut.
For obvious reasons, it’s difficult to attract talented officers into IA. My relative was offered a generous pay raise and the use of a city car to commute to and from his home. But it wasn’t enough. When he left IA and was promoted to lieutenant, he lost the car until he made captain a few years later.
Some big cities have civilian review boards that look into allegations of police misconduct. But that’s not a perfect situation either, as board members are tempted to politicize the process in an attempt to make a name for themselves. Or they are insufficiently informed about police procedures.
This problem goes way beyond the police, of course. Remember when Paul Christopher, then the head of Berkshire School in nearby Sheffield, Mass., faced multiple accusations of sexual harassment? The school hired a Manhattan law firm to look into the complaints. They concluded the charges were without merit. And we all know what happened there. State investigators concluded otherwise and Christopher was finally forced to resign.
I’m not comfortable, for that matter, with journalists policing themselves. Yet if we fall down often enough on the job, eventually we have no credibility left and the public will abandon us for another media outlet. But whom exactly are the police accountable to? Not the voters, not the marketplace, and surely, not to themselves. Connecticut’s experience shows the status quo is woefully inadequate.
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

wasn’t it an “internal investigation” that had salisbury’s resident trooper suspended without pay for excersizing his right to free speech? And it took a long court battle to get him vindicated?
Maybe I am grasping at straws. That case was long before I moved to the area. All I know if it is was what I read in the archives. In my expirence it is the good police officers that get their name tarnished because of these things.
Comment by fred — December 7, 2006 #
I wasn’t working in CT at the time (though I was living here) but it’s my recollection there’s a lot of evidence Trooper Mark Lauretano was the victim of an internal investigation motivated more by “internal” politics and 1st amendment issues than getting at the truth. So Fred S, I think you are right, the Lauretano case is probably another one that proves my point. I should have done some additional research and mentioned it in the post. Thanks for the reminder.
Click here for a refresher on the Lauretano case.
Comment by Terry — December 7, 2006 #
This is one of the more “scary” stories in a while. Any business, nevermind a police agency, needs the checks and balances of a body of its peers to investigate internal problems.
A polcie depatment out of control is just about as bad a a gang of thugs.
Marshall
Comment by Marshall Miles — December 8, 2006 #
Having experienced first hand the lying and manipulating of Troop B officers when my stepson was involved in a very serious auto accident, I can say this doesn’t surprise me at all. Either the State Police training is insufficient, or the personality traits of individuals choosing the profession should be looked at more carefully. I am reminded of a lawsuit brought against the state of CT by an applicant some years ago because he was turned down for being “too smart”.
We should also remember the HARASSMENT that Mark Laretano’s wife Kathy (also a Trooper), endured when she questioned some police “maneuvering”.
Comment by Paul Henrici — December 8, 2006 #
at times when i see stories of crooked and corrupt cops.. I look the albany times union archives, an see snippets of ploice repots where my uncle, a former NY State trooper, worked to make New York safer.. from stopping drug dealers… to joining the national guard after 9/11.. even being injured on duty.
Like I said before.. most of the cops are heros. the bad ones just ruin it for the bunch.
Comment by fred — December 8, 2006 #
Here’s an example of what I’m talking about. Congress investigates itself.
Comment by Terry — December 9, 2006 #
Pick up the paper this week to read an editorial that discusses this topic in more depth.
Comment by Janet Manko — December 10, 2006 #