<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funder&#8217;s Keepers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/</link>
	<description>The View From Connecticut's Northwest Corner</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>can we begin to reffer to this as "Fundgate"  or does that sound too much like a wall street power broker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we begin to reffer to this as &#8220;Fundgate&#8221;  or does that sound too much like a wall street power broker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gale Toensing</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Gale Toensing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Which may explain why so many journalists have left the MSM to write in the blogosphere where the etiquette is always to give references, attributions, and cross-postings. 

Terry, you live in two worlds!  (And it's clear which one you're enjoying the most!)

Good work, colleague!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which may explain why so many journalists have left the MSM to write in the blogosphere where the etiquette is always to give references, attributions, and cross-postings. </p>
<p>Terry, you live in two worlds!  (And it&#8217;s clear which one you&#8217;re enjoying the most!)</p>
<p>Good work, colleague!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bartomioli</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bartomioli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Nice job terry.  I would suggest a citation in his column as well as the WSJ.

Now you have something in common with Steely Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job terry.  I would suggest a citation in his column as well as the WSJ.</p>
<p>Now you have something in common with Steely Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>so he admits it's his fault in latin... then makes excuses in english....  thats funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so he admits it&#8217;s his fault in latin&#8230; then makes excuses in english&#8230;.  thats funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Miles</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Terry:

What a riot!
Thats a poor ass excuse if ever I heard one. 
He admitted to ripping you off....sort of!!
Anyone is the newspaper business would probably be fired.

Keep up the good work.
Marshall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry:</p>
<p>What a riot!<br />
Thats a poor ass excuse if ever I heard one.<br />
He admitted to ripping you off&#8230;.sort of!!<br />
Anyone is the newspaper business would probably be fired.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.<br />
Marshall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>if i were you, i would check my server logs and refferals to see if anyone's IP address points anywhere near WSJ, their affiliates, or editors.

it's a daunting boring task..  but you may find something incriminating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i were you, i would check my server logs and refferals to see if anyone&#8217;s IP address points anywhere near WSJ, their affiliates, or editors.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s a daunting boring task..  but you may find something incriminating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcextra.com/terrycowgill/2006/08/21/funders-keepers/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>You won't be the first blogger to be ripped off by the MSM. Frankly, I think journalists and pundits do most of their "research" by scanning technorati for content. Just another sign that the MSM is going down the tubes. Don't forget my prediction last year that the NYT would be named Yahoo (or some such) before 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You won&#8217;t be the first blogger to be ripped off by the MSM. Frankly, I think journalists and pundits do most of their &#8220;research&#8221; by scanning technorati for content. Just another sign that the MSM is going down the tubes. Don&#8217;t forget my prediction last year that the NYT would be named Yahoo (or some such) before 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
